مساعدة:فحص التحرير (أداة التحقق)
فحص التحرير هي أداة في المحرّر المرئي تقترح تحسينات على مقالات ويكيبيديا قبل نشر التعديلات. يمكن إعداد الصفحة محلياً من قبل إداريّي الواجهة.
This page is meant to equip people who are seeking to understand, use, and/or contribute to the Edit Check project with the information and resources they need to do so.
Several features are available within Edit Check:
التحقق من المرجع
إذا أضفت نصًا طويلًا دون أي استشهاد، سيذكّرك محقّق المرجع بإضافة استشهاد. This only works for edits made using the visual editor.
خيارات الإعدادات المحلية تشمل:
تم إدخال التحقّق من المرجع في أواخر عام 2023. يُرجى الإبلاغ عن المشاكل على صفحة النقاش.
Testing Reference check
URL snippet
- Edit any article in the main namespace using the visual editor.
- The feature is only available for articles.
- Add
&ecenable=1
to the URL in your browser.- Example:
https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Soleil&veaction=edit&ecenable=1
- Example:
- Reload the page with the new URL.
- Create a new paragraph, that is at least 50 characters long without adding a citation
- Press the Publish…
- Notice the prompt that appears
- ✅ Test is completed.
- Don't save your edit unless you know what you are doing!
Logged out mode
On Wikipedias where References check is deployed by default , you can test it while being logged out of your account (using the "incognito mode" in your browser, for instance). Adding a new paragraph with no reference to any article will show you References check.
Tags used
We use the following tags in Recent Changes and Watchlist, so that users can identify edits where Edit Check was activated, and the reasons why a user decided not to add a citation.
editcheck-references
- يعتقد EditCheck أنه ربما كانت هناك حاجة إلى مرجع في هذا التعديل
editcheck-newcontent
- EditCheck thinks new content was added to the page
editcheck-references-activated
- فحص التحرير (أداة التحقق) مفعلّة
- EditCheck thinks a reference might have been needed, and the UI was shown
editcheck-reference-decline-common-knowledge
- تم رفض (ثقافة عامة) التحقّق من التحرير (مراجع)
- تم رفض مرجع EditCheck (أداة التحقّق) باعتباره ثقافةً عامة
editcheck-reference-decline-other
- تم رفض (سبب آخر) التحقّق من التحرير (مراجع)
- تم رفض مرجع EditCheck (أداة التحقق) لسبب غير مدرج
editcheck-reference-decline-uncertain
- تم رفض (ثقافة عامة) التحقّق من التحرير (غير متحقِّق)
- تم رفض مرجع EditCheck (أداة النحقّق) لأنه غير متحقِّق
editcheck-reference-decline-irrelevant
- تم رفض (غير ذي صلة) التحقّق من التحرير (مراجع)
- تم رفض مرجع EditCheck (أداة التحقّق) باعتباره غير ذي صلة
References check default configuration
- Reference check is shown to all logged-out users, and to logged-in users with less than 100 edits.
Reference check is shown when a new paragraph of more than 50 characters is added.
Link check and Reference reliability
Reference reliability
Reference reliability evaluates all external domains people attempt to insert using Citoid to against defined sources.
Link check
Link Check evaluates all external domains people attempt to link using the link insertion inspector to against defined sources.
Defined sources for rejected URLs
The following sources are used by Link check and Reference reliability to verify if a URL is blocked:
- Local lists, defined by each community:
MediaWiki:BlockedExternalDomains.json
,MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist
- Global list, shared by all wikis :
meta:Spam_blacklist
Configuration
Communities can configure how Edit check works at their wiki.
Glossary
All terms we use are defined in the glossary.
FAQ
- How do you decide what Checks to build?
- The Editing team prioritizes building Edit Checks that have the potential to reduce the likelihood that an edit someone publishes causes a negative consequence for:
- The person making the edit
- People who read Wikipedia
- Experienced volunteers who work to make Wikipedia a resource people can depend on.
- What editing interfaces is Edit Check being developed for?
- To start, Edit Check is being developed for the visual editor on both mobile and desktop.
- How does Edit Check and AbuseFilter relate? What are the distinctions between these two capabilities?
- As of June 2024, Edit check provides feedback when the editor clicks on "Publish changes...". This is where AbuseFiter is shown. The difference is that Edit Check offers feedback within the editing experience. The Editing team is also looking into the possibility of displaying checks during the editing experience. These checks would react to actions taken by the user. We also plan to display multiple checks within the editing experience, to highlight a few different improvements at once.
- Reference Check is displayed when a new paragraph is added. Some published edits show some text and a citation being added to an existing paragraph, tagged for Reference Check. Why?
- Edit Check is shown to the user who then add a new citation. Then, they can decide to change their edit before publishing, by merging it with an existing paragraph.
- What is the next check you plan to work on?
- Our next check is "Paste Check". You can submit your ideas for a new check on our Ideas page.